Did not Nietzsche too warn of that “life-destroying enlightenment†that touches on our life-supporting self-delusions? Can we afford to shake up the “basic fictions†of privacy, personality, and identity? Be that as it may, in this question both old and new conservatives have come to the hard decision to take the “stance†of defending, against all the demands of reflection, their “unavoidable lies for living,†without which self-preservation would not be possible. That they are aided in this by the general fear of self-experience, which competes with curiosity about self-experience, does not have to be expressly emphasized. Thus the theater of respectable, closed egos goes on everywhere, even where the means have long been available to secure better knowledge. Crosswise to all political fronts, it is the “ego†in society that offers the most resolute resistance against the decisive enlightenment. Scarcely anyone will put up with radical self-reflection on this point, not even many of those who regard themselves as enlighteners.
Peter Sloterdijk