What is another word for governing body?

Pronunciation: [ɡˈʌvənɪŋ bˈɒdi] (IPA)

When we talk about the governing body of an organization, it refers to a group of individuals who make policies and decisions that shape the direction of the organization. Rather than using the same phrase repeatedly, we can use synonyms that convey the same meaning. Some of the synonyms for the governing body include management team, board of directors, executive committee, leadership council, oversight committee, executive board, and governing council. Each of these phrases represents a group of individuals who are responsible for the management and direction of an organization. When writing about governance, it is essential to have a varied vocabulary to keep the content engaging and professional.

What are the hypernyms for Governing body?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for governing body?

Antonyms for "governing body" are terms used to refer to entities or groups that do not have the power to govern or regulate a particular organization. Some of the antonyms include "unregulated body," "unstructured group," "unmonitored organization," and "decentralized entity." These antonyms suggest that such entities or groups do not have the same level of authority and control as a governing body. They may lack formal rules, guidelines, or processes to manage and maintain the organization effectively. While the term "governing body" implies a centralized authority and hierarchy, these antonyms suggest a more flexible, informal, or autonomous approach to organizational management.

What are the antonyms for Governing body?

Famous quotes with Governing body

  • Of greater importance than this regulation of African clientship were the political consequences of the Jugurthine war or rather of the Jugurthine insurrection, although these have been frequently estimated too highly. Certainly all the evils of the government were therein brought to light in all their nakedness; it was now not merely notorious but, so to speak, judicially established, that among the governing lords of Rome everything was treated as venal--the treaty of peace and the right of intercession, the rampart of the camp and the life of the soldier; the African had said no more than the simple truth, when on his departure from Rome he declared that, if he had only gold enough, he would undertake to buy the city itself. But the whole external and internal government of this period bore the same stamp of miserable baseness. In our case the accidental fact, that the war in Africa is brought nearer to us by means of better accounts than the other contemporary military and political events, shifts the true perspective; contemporaries learned by these revelations nothing but what everybody knew long before and every intrepid patriot had long been in a position to support by facts. The circumstance, however, that they were now furnished with some fresh, still stronger and still more irrefutable, proofs of the baseness of the restored senatorial government--a baseness only surpassed by its incapacity--might have been of importance, had there been an opposition and a public opinion with which the government would have found it necessary to come to terms. But this war had in fact exposed the corruption of the government no less than it had revealed the utter nullity of the opposition. It was not possible to govern worse than the restoration governed in the years 637-645; it was not possible to stand forth more defenceless and forlorn than was the Roman senate in 645: had there been in Rome a real opposition, that is to say, a party which wished and urged a fundamental alteration of the constitution, it must necessarily have now made at least an attempt to overturn the restored senate. No such attempt took place; the political question was converted into a personal one, the generals were changed, and one or two useless and unimportant people were banished. It was thus settled, that the so-called popular party as such neither could nor would govern; that only two forms of government were at all possible in Rome, a -tyrannis- or an oligarchy; that, so long as there happened to be nobody sufficiently well known, if not sufficiently important, to usurp the regency of the state, the worst mismanagement endangered at the most individual oligarchs, but never the oligarchy; that on the other hand, so soon as such a pretender appeared, nothing was easier than to shake the rotten curule chairs. In this respect the coming forward of Marius was significant, just because it was in itself so utterly unwarranted. If the burgesses had stormed the senate-house after the defeat of Albinus, it would have been a natural, not to say a proper course; but after the turn which Metellus had given to the Numidian war, nothing more could be said of mismanagement, and still less of danger to the commonwealth, at least in this respect; and yet the first ambitious officer who turned up succeeded in doing that with which the older Africanus had once threatened the government,(16) and procured for himself one of the principal military commands against the distinctly- expressed will of the governing body. Public opinion, unavailing in the hands of the so-called popular party, became an irresistible weapon in the hands of the future king of Rome. We do not mean to say
    Theodor Mommsen

Word of the Day

Professional Liabilities
The word "professional liabilities" refers to the legal or ethical obligations of a person working in a professional capacity. Antonyms for this term would incorporate words or phr...