did a devastating hatchet job on Uri Geller (and others). selected those events and circumstances thoroughly discrediting Geller. also grouped such meticulous researchers as Charles Tart with highly suspect and careless showmen, tarring all with the same brush. Guilt by association is hardly objective journalism. Nevertheless most "nonordinary" phenomena subjective and not amenable to cultural "prediction and control." This has been one issue of my book. Should Geller-type material become fully acceptable within such channels of the culture such as , we would know that the cultural force would have absorbed, and not destroyed, the -sign value of such phenomena. When those working in the field of "nonordinary" phenomena stop trying to prove to the , they will make a great leap forward. Anonymity is the direction.
Joseph Chilton Pearce