What is another word for in-effaceable?

Pronunciation: [ɪnɪfˈe͡ɪsəbə͡l] (IPA)

The word "in-effaceable" refers to something that cannot be erased or forgotten. There are several synonyms for this term that describe the same concept, including indelible, permanent, enduring, lasting, and ineradicable. Each of these words suggests a sense of longevity and permanence, indicating that a certain impression, memory, or mark is unlikely to disappear over time. In any context, whether it's describing emotions, events, or physical objects, these synonyms emphasize the significance of what cannot be erased or forgotten and underscore its power or importance in some way.

What are the hypernyms for In-effaceable?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for in-effaceable?

In-effaceable means permanent or not erasable. Antonyms for this word include erasable, removable, temporary, and impermanent. Erasable refers to something that can be erased or removed easily, whereas in-effaceable is something that cannot be erased. Removing something is temporary which is opposite of in-effaceable because something in-effaceable is permanent. Impermanent refers to something that is temporary or not lasting for a long time, while in-effaceable refers to something that is permanent and cannot be changed. Overall, the antonyms for in-effaceable are related to change, erasure, and temporary measures, while in-effaceable is permanent and unchanging.

What are the antonyms for In-effaceable?

Related words: permanent marker, ineffaceable marker pen, ineffaceable marker, permanent marker pens, ineffaceable marker pen reviews, permanent marker pens

Related questions:

  • Does a permanent marker remove ink?
  • Does an indelible marker come off with rubbing alcohol?
  • Does permanent marker dry out pen tips?
  • Do pens write well on glass?
  • Word of the Day

    R OF O
    The word "R OF O" does not exist in the English language or any other language. It is likely a typographical error and was intended to be another word. Without the correct word, it...