What is another word for is announced?

Pronunciation: [ɪz ɐnˈa͡ʊnst] (IPA)

When something is announced, it means that information or news has been made public. However, there are several synonyms that can be used to convey the same idea. One alternative could be "is declared," which emphasizes the official nature of the announcement. Another synonym could be "is revealed," which suggests that previously unknown information is being disclosed. "Is broadcasted" is another option, particularly if the announcement is being made through media channels. Other possibilities include "is communicated," "is disclosed," "is made known," and "is proclaimed." Regardless of which synonym is used, the essential meaning remains the same: something new has been shared with others.

What are the hypernyms for Is announced?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for is announced?

The term "is announced" is typically used to indicate the broadcast or communication of a particular message or piece of information. Some common antonyms for this phrase include "is concealed," "is kept secret," and "is withheld." These antonyms imply that information is being intentionally hidden or not shared with others. Other possible antonyms for "is announced" include "is speculated," "is rumored," and "is uncertain." These antonyms suggest that the information being discussed is not yet confirmed or may be unreliable. Regardless of the antonym used, it is important to consider the context in which the phrase is being used to determine its true meaning.

What are the antonyms for Is announced?

  • v.

    come out

Famous quotes with Is announced

  • Did you ever wonder why the Jews are such great proponents of democracy? Whether in Indonesia or Pakistan or Serbia or you name it, whenever there is some threat to universal suffrage, the Jews are ready to send the U.S. armed forces in to bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to vote. Why is that? Why can't the Indonesians have an Islamic theocracy if they want? Why can't the Pakistanis have a military dictatorship? Why can't the Serbs run their own country the way they prefer? What is the appeal in making sure that people whose minds have been wasted by Alzheimer's Disease vote? Well, let's not beat around the bush: the appeal of mass democracy lies in the fact that in essentially every country in the world today, the number of persons unable to think for themselves is substantially larger than the number able to make independent decisions. Those unable to think for themselves have their thinking done for them by the people who control the mass media. Which is to say, democracy is the preferred system because it gives the political power to those who own or control the mass media and at the same time allows them to remain behind the scenes and evade responsibility for the way in which they use that power. And the more inclusive the democracy is -- that is, the more Alzheimer's sufferers and Mongoloid cretinsand paranoid schizophrenics and people who live in empty packing cases in alley ways and Jamaican immigrants and football fans are able to vote -- the more certain is the grip of the media masters on the political process. Those voters who buy astrology magazines at the checkout stand and spend their time watching soap operas, game shows, and Oprah absorb their general attitudes on things through the television screen. They learn which ideas are fashionable and which are not by noticing the facial expression and tone of voice of Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather when the news is announced each day. Their opinions on specific issues are formed as they view televised sidewalk surveys taken by reporters. The only uncertainty about these people is whether or not they'll be able to pryt hemselves loose from their couches long enough to vote for the designated candidates. That's why it's important to have lots of them. And wherever there are lots of them, the men who control the mass media also will control the outcome of elections. It's a much surer way of controlling governments than bribing corrupt dictators or slipping seductive whores into the king's bedroom a la Esther and Ahasuerus -- or Monica and Bill. Believe me, one day soon the Jews on both sides of the great water will institute a web-TV voting system that allows the couch potatoes and the ball game fans to vote without having to getup from their couches, just by clicking their remote controls at their TV screens to select the next President or prime minister. That will be real democracy.
    William Luther Pierce
  • M. André Mayer … made an astonishing confidence not long ago. “The laboratories,” he said, “are working at this moment with splendid results. In physics and biology, for example, we can predict new and very important discoveries. What is humanity going to do with the power which will soon be put into its hands? Humanity is not yet ready to receive this power. It is not in a state to make good use of it.” The events of the moment prove that this power, of which we know very little yet, and which is announced to us with such proper reserve, has little chance of serving the cause of man straight away. It will more probably be employed, or rather confiscated, for the benefit of the ambitious, the impudent, and the reckless.
    Georges Duhamel

Word of the Day

Chases sign
The term "Chases sign" refers to a linguistic phenomenon known as synonymy, wherein multiple words or phrases are used interchangeably to convey a similar meaning. Synonyms for "Ch...