What is another word for more evil?

Pronunciation: [mˈɔːɹ ˈiːvə͡l] (IPA)

The word "more evil" can be replaced with synonyms such as wicked, malevolent, malicious, diabolical, sinister, nefarious, vile, heinous, and iniquitous. Each of these words is used to describe something that is morally wrong, unethical, vicious, or harmful. For example, a wicked person is someone who intentionally causes harm or is morally corrupt. A diabolical act is one that is done with evil intent. Nefarious behavior refers to actions that are both immoral and illegal. The use of these synonyms helps to add depth to the description of evil and can help to create a more vivid picture in the mind of the reader.

Synonyms for More evil:

What are the hypernyms for More evil?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for more evil?

The antonyms for the word "more evil" could include terms such as "virtuous," "pure," "wholesome," "upright," "noble," and "righteous." These words reflect the opposite of evil, which is commonly associated with wickedness, malevolence, and immorality. By using these antonyms, we can emphasize the positive qualities that contrast with evil and emphasize the importance of living a morally upright life. In contrast to the darkness and negativity associated with the term "more evil," these antonyms promote optimism, hope, and goodness. Ultimately, the usage of antonyms can be a powerful tool for conveying the contrast between negative and positive qualities in language.

What are the antonyms for More evil?

Famous quotes with More evil

  • In every man sleeps a prophet, and when he wakes there is a little more evil in the world.
    Emile M. Cioran
  • Even philosophers will praise war as ennobling mankind, forgetting the Greek who said: 'War is bad in that it begets more evil than it kills.'
    Immanuel Kant
  • Tolerating evil leads only to more evil. And when good people stand by and do nothing while wickedness reigns, their communities will be consumed.
    Bob Riley
  • Since September 11, 2001, I have often thought that perhaps it was fortunate for the world that the attackers targeted the World Trade Center instead of the Statue of Liberty, for if they had destroyed our sacred symbol of democracy I fear we as Americans would have been unable to keep ourselves from indulging in paroxysms of revenge of a sort the world has never seen before. If that had happened, it would have befouled the meaning of the Statue of Liberty beyond any hope of subsequent redemption — if there were any people left to care. I have learned from my students that this upsetting thought of mine is subject to several unfortunate misconstruals, so let me expand on it to ward them off. The killing of thousands of innocents in the World Trade Center was a heinous crime, much more evil than the destruction of the Statue of Liberty would have been. And, yes, the World Trade Center was a much more appropriate symbol of al Qaeda's wrath than the Statue of Liberty would have been, but for that very reason it didn't mean as much, as a symbol, . It was Mammon and Plutocrats and Globalization, not Lady Liberty. I do suspect that the fury with which Americans would have responded to the unspeakable defilement of our cherished national symbol, the purest image of our aspirations as a democracy, would have made a sane and measured response extraordinarily difficult. This is the great danger of symbols — they can become too "sacred". An important task for religious people of all faiths in the twenty-first century will be spreading the conviction that there are no acts more dishonorable than harming "infidels" of one stripe or another for "disrespecting" a flag, a cross, a holy text.
    Daniel Dennett
  • The oppressive weight of disaster and tragedy in our lives does not arise from a high percentage of evil among the summed total of all acts, but from the extraordinary power of exceedingly rare incidents of depravity to inflict catastrophic damage, especially in our technological age when airplanes can become powerful bombs. (An even more evil man, armed only with a longbow, could not have wreaked such havoc at the Battle of Agincourt in 1415.)
    Stephen Jay Gould

Word of the Day

Professional Liabilities
The word "professional liabilities" refers to the legal or ethical obligations of a person working in a professional capacity. Antonyms for this term would incorporate words or phr...