What is another word for normatively?

Pronunciation: [nˈɔːmətˌɪvli] (IPA)

Normatively can be replaced by some other synonyms to convey the same meaning. They include prescriptively, standardly, conventionally, customary, traditionally, and morally. Each of these synonyms suggests that something is being judged according to a set of rules or principles and conforms to an accepted standard. Normatively has its roots in the idea of norms, which are shared standards of behavior or conduct. Therefore, the use of normatively or its synonyms implies a certain level of agreement among people as to what is acceptable or expected in a particular situation.

Synonyms for Normatively:

What are the hypernyms for Normatively?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Famous quotes with Normatively

  • The pure normative standpoint that Kant’s ethics tries to occupy, a standpoint in which we consider only the normatively relevant features of a possible world, abstracting strictly from the real world and the empirical accidents of concrete situations, is an expression of what Dewey called “the quest for certainty.” In an insecure world, weak humans struggle convulsively to reach some kind of stability; the a priori is an overcompensation in thought for experienced human weakness. This is one of the origins of Kant’s notorious rigidity, his authoritarian devotion to “principles,” and his tendency to promote local habits of thought to constituents of the absolute framework in which alone (purportedly) any coherent experience was possible; thus, Euclidean geometry is declared the a priori condition of human experience, and sadistic remnants of Puritanism become demands of pure practical reason. Classical liberalism rejected Kant’s practical philosophy, but perhaps this is not enough. Perhaps one should also reject the very idea of a pure normative standpoint.
    Raymond Geuss
  • What agents would choose in certain well- defined conditions of ignorance (in the “original position”) is, for Rawls, an important criterion for determining which conception of “justice” is normatively acceptable. Why should we agree that choice under conditions of ignorance is a good criterion for deciding what kind of society we would wish to have? William Morris in the late nineteenth century claimed to prefer a society of more or less equal grinding poverty for all (e.g., the society he directly experienced in Iceland) to Britain with its extreme discrepancies of wealth and welfare, even though the least well-off in Britain were in absolute terms better off than the peasants and fishermen of Iceland.” This choice seems to have been based not on any absolute preference for equality (or on a commitment to any conception of fairness), but on a belief about the specific social (and other) evils that flowed from the ways in which extreme wealth could be used in an industrial capitalist society.” Would no one in the original position entertain views like these? Is Morris’s vote simply to be discounted? On what grounds? The “veil of ignorance” is artificially defined so as to allow certain bits of knowledge “in” and to exclude other bits. No doubt it would be possible to rig the veil of ignorance so that it blanks out knowledge of the particular experiences Morris had and the theories he developed, and renders them inaccessible in the original position, but one would then have to be convinced that this was not simply a case of modifying the conditions of the thought experiment and the procedure until one got the result one antecedently wanted.
    Raymond Geuss

Word of the Day

R OF O
The word "R OF O" does not exist in the English language or any other language. It is likely a typographical error and was intended to be another word. Without the correct word, it...