What is another word for Petitio Principii?
Pronunciation: [pɛtˈɪtɪˌə͡ʊ pɹˈɪnsɪpˌɪa͡ɪ] (IPA) 
Petitio Principii is a logical fallacy where an argument is made using a premise that assumes the conclusion to be true without providing any supporting evidence. Synonyms for this fallacy include begging the question, circular reasoning, and circular argument. Other synonyms include assuming the answer, tautology, and fallacy of assumption. The argument essentially goes around in circles, where the premise and conclusion are presented as if they are separate components of the argument, when in fact, they are the same thing. Given the prevalence of this fallacy in everyday language and discourse, it is essential to recognize it and differentiate between arguments that present valid reasoning versus those that rely on this logical error.
