What is another word for social theory?

Pronunciation: [sˈə͡ʊʃə͡l θˈi͡əɹi] (IPA)

Social theory refers to a broad area of thought that examines social structures, relationships, and interactions between individuals and society. There are various synonyms that can be used to describe social theory, including sociological theory, social sciences, culture studies, political theory, and social philosophy. Sociological theory emphasizes the systematic study of the social structures and institutions that shape human behavior. Culture studies examines the norms and values of different societies, while political theory explores the nature of power relationships within society. Social philosophy, on the other hand, focuses on the moral and ethical implications of social phenomena and human behavior. Overall, social theory is an interdisciplinary field that seeks to understand human behavior within the context of society.

Synonyms for Social theory:

What are the hypernyms for Social theory?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Famous quotes with Social theory

  • I would say that, intellectually, Catholicism had no more impact on me than did social theory.
    Paul Farmer
  • Universities are an example of organizations dominated wholly by intellectuals; yet, outside pure science, they have not been an optimal milieu for the unfolding of creative talents. In neither art, music, literature, technology and social theory, nor planning have the Universities figured as originators or as seedbeds of new talents and energies.
    Eric Hoffer
  • Tony knew that the disappearance of social theory, our common fate today, is not to be remedied so easily. The programmatic alternative to the present Tony came to favor— imagining a different future—depends, as he saw, on a social theory underlying it. And in spite of the fact that Marxism towered over the modern landscape, there are other possibilities. Keynes—Tony’s apparent hero at the end—presupposed a social theory too, though so did Friedrich Hayek, and the point is not just to revive their dispute simply to take sides but rather to understand their contention as the clash of philosophical visions it was, both broadly about the nature of social life and more narrowly about the place of modernity in it.
    Tony Judt
  • As we now know, in the evolution of the structure of human activities, profitability works as a signal that guides selection towards what makes man more fruitful; only what is more profitable will, as a rule, nourish more people, for it sacrifices less than it adds. So much was at least sensed by some Greeks prior to Aristotle. Indeed, in the fifth century - that is, before Aristotle - the first truly great historian began his history of the Peloponnesian War by reflecting how early people `without commerce, without freedom of communication either by land or sea, cultivating no more of their territory than the exigencies of life required, could never rise above nomadic life' and consequently `neither built large cities nor attained to any other form of greatness' (Thucydides, Crawly translation, 1,1,2). But Aristotle ignored this insight. Had the Athenians followed Aristotle's counsel - counsel blind both to economics and to evolution - their city would rapidly have shrunk into a village, for his view of human ordering led him to an ethics appropriate only to, if anywhere at all, a stationary state. Nonetheless his doctrines came to dominate philosophical and religious thinking for the next two thousand years - despite the fact that much of that same philosophical and religious thinking took place within a highly dynamic, rapidly extending, order.(...) The anti-commercial attitude of the mediaeval and early modern Church, condemnation of interest as usury, its teaching of the just price, and its contemptuous treatment of gain is Aristotelian through and through. (...) Notwithstanding, and indeed wholly neglecting, the existence of this great advance, a view that is still permeated by Aristotelian thought, a naive and childlike animistic view of the world (Piaget, 1929:359), has come to dominate social theory and is the foundation of socialist thought.
    Aristotle
  • It is as if a really secure nationalism, already in possession of its nation-state, can fail to see itself as 'nationalist' at all. Its own distinctive bonding is perceived as natural and obvious by contrast with the mere projections of any nationalism which is still in active progress and thus incomplete. At this point radicals and minority nationalists emphasize the artificialities of the settled 'common sense' nation-state and to their own satisfaction shoot them to pieces from history and from social theory.
    Raymond Williams

Word of the Day

fraternal benefit society benefits
The antonyms for "fraternal benefit society benefits" are difficult to pinpoint as they are more conceptual than actual opposites. However, some potential antonyms may include "ind...