What is another word for am no more?

Pronunciation: [am nˈə͡ʊmˌɔː] (IPA)

The phrase "am no more" can have many synonyms, including "ceased to exist," "perished," "passed away," "gone forever," "departed," "expired," "died," "vanished," "faded away," "disappeared," "ended," "gone to the great beyond," "kicked the bucket," "checked out," "crossed over," "gone to a better place," "moved on," and "joined the choir invisible." It's important to remember that discussing death can be sensitive, and choosing the appropriate synonym will depend on the context and audience. Overall, there are many ways to express a loved one's passing or one's own mortality.

Synonyms for Am no more:

What are the hypernyms for Am no more?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for am no more?

The phrase "am no more" refers to ceasing to exist or dying. Its antonyms, on the other hand, are words that convey the opposite meaning. The word "live" is a suitable antonym to "am no more" as it suggests continuing to exist or being in a state of being alive. "Exist" can also be used as an antonym for "am no more" since it implies being present or having being. "Survive," "thrive," "prosper," and "flourish" can also be used as antonyms for "am no more" as they carry the meaning of living or thriving. In summary, antonyms for "am no more" emphasize being alive and present.

What are the antonyms for Am no more?

Famous quotes with Am no more

  • I am no more a witch than you are a wizard. If you take my life away, God will give you blood to drink.
    Sarah Good
  • I am no more humble than my talents require.
    Oscar Levant
  • I am no more humble than my talents require.
    Oscar Levant
  • A few years after the Constitution was adopted Alexander Hamilton said to Josiah Quincy that he thought the Union might endure for thirty years. He feared the centrifugal force of the system. The danger, he said, would proceed from the States, not from the national government. But Hamilton seems not to have considered that the vital necessity which had always united the colonies from the first New England league against the Indians, and which, in his own time, forced the people of the country from the sands of a confederacy to the rock of union, would become stronger every year and inevitably develop and confirm a nation. Whatever the intention of the fathers in 1787 might have been, whether a league or confederacy or treaty, the conclusion of the children in 1860 might have been predicted. Plant a homogeneous people along the coast of a virgin continent. Let them gradually overspread it to the farther sea, speaking the same language, virtually of the same religious faith, inter- marrying, and cherishing common heroic traditions. Suppose them sweeping from end to end of their vast domain without passports, the physical perils of their increasing extent constantly modified by science, steam, and the telegraph, making Maine and Oregon neighbors, their trade enormous, their prosperity a miracle, their commonwealth of unsurpassed importance in the world, and you may theorize as you will, but you have supposed an imperial nation, which may indeed be a power of evil as well as of good, but which can no more recede into its original elements and local sources than its own Mississippi, pouring broad and resistless into the Gulf, can turn backward to the petty forest springs and rills whence it flows. 'No, no', murmurs the mighty river, 'when you can take the blue out of the sky, when you can steal heat from fire, when you can strip splendor from the morning, then, and not before, may you reclaim your separate drops in me'. 'Yes, yes, my river,' answers the Union, 'you speak for me. I am no more a child, but a man; no longer a confederacy, but a nation. I am no more Virginia, New York, Carolina, or Massachusetts, but the United States of America'.
    George William Curtis
  • Hamilton doubted the cohesive force of the Constitution to make a nation. He was so far right, for no constitution can make a nation. That is a growth, and the vigor and intensity of our national growth transcended our own suspicions. It was typified by our material progress. General Hamilton died in 1804. In 1812, during the last war with England, the largest gun used was a thirty-six pounder. In the war just ended it was a two-thousand pounder. The largest gun then weighed two thousand pounds. The largest shot now weighs two thousand pounds. Twenty years after Hamilton died the traveler toiled painfully from the Hudson to Niagara on canal-boats and in wagons, and thence on horseback to Kentucky. Now he whirls from the Hudson to the Mississippi upon thousands of miles of various railroads, the profits of which would pay the interest of the national debt. So by a myriad influences, as subtle as the forces of the air and earth about a growing tree, has our nationality grown and strengthened, striking its roots to the centre and defying the tempest. Could the musing statesman who feared that Virginia or New York or Carolina or Massachusetts might rend the Union have heard the voice of sixty years later, it would have said to him, 'The babe you held in your arms has grown to be a man, who walks and runs and leaps and works and defends himself. I am no more a vapor, I am condensed. I am no more a germ, I am a life. I am no more a confederation, I am a nation'.
    George William Curtis

Word of the Day

Professional Liabilities
The word "professional liabilities" refers to the legal or ethical obligations of a person working in a professional capacity. Antonyms for this term would incorporate words or phr...