What is another word for being ruled by?

Pronunciation: [bˌiːɪŋ ɹˈuːld bˈa͡ɪ] (IPA)

When talking about governance, "being ruled by" is a phrase often used to describe a situation where an individual or a group of individuals have complete control over a state or organization. However, there are several synonyms that can be used to convey the same meaning. "Governed by," "dominated by," "controlled by," and "ruled over by" are some common alternatives. Each of these phrases highlights the notion of authority, power, and control. Whether it is an autocratic regime or a democratic government, being subjected to the control of any entity implies the absence of freedom and democracy. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the implications of using these synonyms while discussing governance.

Synonyms for Being ruled by:

What are the hypernyms for Being ruled by?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for being ruled by?

Being ruled by refers to the act of being controlled or governed by someone or something else. An antonym for this word would be the phrase 'being in control of,' which means having authority or power over oneself or others. Being in control of involves making decisions independently and taking responsibility for the outcomes. Another antonym for being ruled by is 'being free,' which suggests the absence of external control. Alternatively, 'being autonomous' or 'being self-governed' are also antonyms for being ruled by, as they denote the ability to function independently without outside influence or authority.

Famous quotes with Being ruled by

  • Hobbes’s understanding of the dangers of anarchy resonates powerfully today. Liberal thinkers still see the unchecked power of the state as the chief danger to human freedom. Hobbes knew better: freedom’s worst enemy is anarchy, which is at its most destructive when it is a battleground of rival faiths. The sectarian death squads roaming Baghdad show that fundamentalism is itself a type of anarchy in which each prophet claims divine authority to rule. In well-governed societies, the power of faith is curbed. The state and the churches temper the claims of revelation and enforce peace. Where this kind is impossible, tyranny is better than being ruled by warring prophets. Hobbes is a more reliable guide to the present than the liberal thinkers who followed. Yet his view of human beings was too simple, and overly rationalistic. Assuming that humans dread violent death more than anything, he left out the most intractable sources of conflict. It is not always because human beings act irrationally that they fail to achieve peace. Sometimes it is because they do not want peace. They may want the victory of the One True Faith – whether a traditional religion or a secular successor such as communism, democracy or universal human rights. Or – like the young people who joined far-Left terrorist groups in the 1970s, another generation of which is now joining Islamist networks – they may find in war a purpose that is lacking in peace. Nothing is more human than the readiness to kill and die in order to secure a meaning in life.
    John Gray (philosopher)
  • It is not in the nature of any people that it should willingly endure being ruled by another people, whether it is ruled ill or ruled well.
    Avram Davidson

Word of the Day

tiebreak
Tiebreak, synonymous with "overtime" or simply "sudden death," is a term used predominantly in sports to determine a winner in a situation where the game ends in a tie. Other relat...