What is another word for fire-and-brimstone?

Pronunciation: [fˈa͡ɪ͡əɹandbɹˈɪmstə͡ʊn] (IPA)

"Fire-and-brimstone" is often used to describe sermons or speeches that warn of eternal damnation and punishment for those who do not follow a particular belief system. Some synonyms for this phrase could include "hellfire," "damnation," "apocalyptic," "puritanical," or "judgmental." These words all carry connotations of fear and warning, emphasizing the severity of the consequences for not adhering to strict religious or moral codes. However, it is important to recognize that such language can also be used to manipulate and control people, and may not be a fair or accurate representation of all belief systems.

What are the hypernyms for Fire-and-brimstone?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Famous quotes with Fire-and-brimstone

  • The simple truth is that the fire-and-brimstone preachers used to use this precise passage [Luke 12:4-5] to support their message. After all, we have Jesus directly telling you to fear God because of what he can do to you after you’re dead. Ray, I believe, knows this and he knows the distaste the general public has for fire-and-brimstone preachers, so he’s twisting and turning like a twisty-turny-thing in order to convince someone – anyone – that he’s not like those guys. He doesn’t think we should fear Hell, just the guy who can send us there – because he can send us there – but not really fear, in the sense of being terrified, but fear in the common-sense, ‘healthy respect for’-fashion. Hogwash. I therefore request that Fred Phelps or Shirley Phelps-Roper take a few minutes and call Ray to explain why his particular brand of exegesis isn’t Biblical. It may be more pleasant to Ray, but that’s only because he’s desperately trying to soften the message.
    Ray Comfort
  • I have recently begun to look for people’s “vicar” nature. It is a technique I happened upon quite by chance, but I think it has a precedent in eastern mysticism. In Buddhism they talk of each of us having a “Buddha nature,” a divine self, the aspect of our total persona that is beyond our materialism and individualism. Well, that’s all well and good. What I’m into is people’s “vicar nature”—what a person would be like if they were a vicar. You can do it on anyone; it doesn’t have to be a vicar either if that isn’t your bag, it could be a rabbi or an imam or whatever. Simply think of someone you know, like, I dunno, Hulk Hogan, and imagine them as a devotional being. When I do, it helps me to see where their material persona intersects with a well-meaning spiritual aspect. Reverend Hogan would be, I suspect, a real fire-and-brimstone guy, spasming and retching in the pulpit but easily moved to tears, perhaps by the plight of a childless couple in his parish. Anyway, let’s not get carried away, it’s just a tool to help me see where a person’s essential self might dwell. Oddly, it’s really easy to do with atheists. I can imagine Richard Dawkins as a vicar in an instant, Calvinist and insistent. Dogmatic and determined, having a stern hearthside chat with a seventeen-year-old boy on the cusp of coming out. My point is that in spite of the lack of any theological title, Bobby Roth is like a priest.
    Russell Brand

Word of the Day

Regional Arterial Infusion
The term "regional arterial infusion" refers to the delivery of medication or other therapeutic agents to a specific area of the body via an artery. Antonyms for this term might in...