What is another word for moth-resistant?

Pronunciation: [mˈɒθɹɪsˈɪstənt] (IPA)

Moth-resistant refers to the ability of materials to prevent damage caused by moths and other textile pests. There are several synonyms for moth-resistant, including moth-proof, moth-repellent, moth-proofed, and insect-resistant. These terms indicate that the material has been treated with chemicals or natural substances to deter moths and other insects from damaging it. Other related terms include waterproof, fire-resistant, and stain-resistant, which all describe materials that have been specially treated to provide additional protection against certain types of damage. Whatever the specific term used, the goal is to create materials that are durable and long-lasting, even in the face of potential damage from pests and other natural elements.

Synonyms for Moth-resistant:

What are the hypernyms for Moth-resistant?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.
  • Other hypernyms:

    durable, weatherproof, pest-resistant, insect-resistant, mite-resistant, pesticide-resistant.

What are the opposite words for moth-resistant?

Moths are notorious for damaging clothes and fabrics, but a "moth-resistant" label assures that the material can withstand moth infestations. However, if you're looking for the opposite of "moth-resistant," there are several antonyms to choose from. One option is "moth-prone," indicating that the material is highly susceptible to moth damage. "Moth-vulnerable" and "moth-susceptible" are similar in meaning. Another antonym for "moth-resistant" could be "moth-attracting" or "moth-friendly," which suggests that moths are drawn to the material. Ultimately, when selecting fabrics and materials, it's important to keep in mind their vulnerability to pests like moths, and whether they require any preventative measures.

What are the antonyms for Moth-resistant?

Word of the Day

R OF O
The word "R OF O" does not exist in the English language or any other language. It is likely a typographical error and was intended to be another word. Without the correct word, it...