What is another word for reduced instruction set computer?

Pronunciation: [ɹɪdjˈuːst ɪnstɹˈʌkʃən sˈɛt kəmpjˈuːtə] (IPA)

A Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) is a type of computer architecture that emphasizes simplicity and efficiency in instruction execution by using a limited set of basic instructions. Synonyms for RISC can include Simple Instruction Set Computer (SISC), Reduced-Complexity Computer Instruction Set Computing (RCCISC), and Minimal Instruction Set Computer (MISC). Other related terms include Complex Instruction Set Computer (CISC), Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW), and Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC). These terms describe the opposite of RISC, where the architecture places a greater emphasis on complex instruction sets rather than simplicity in executing basic instructions.

Synonyms for Reduced instruction set computer:

What are the hypernyms for Reduced instruction set computer?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the hyponyms for Reduced instruction set computer?

Hyponyms are more specific words categorized under a broader term, known as a hypernym.

What are the opposite words for reduced instruction set computer?

A "Reduced Instruction Set Computer" (RISC) is a type of microprocessor architecture that uses a small, specialized set of instructions to perform tasks. The opposite of RISC is "Complex Instruction Set Computer" (CISC), which utilizes a large set of complex instructions that may require multiple clock cycles to execute. RISC processors are typically faster and more efficient because they execute instructions in one cycle, while CISC processors may require several cycles. CISC is considered the antonym of RISC. CISC processors tend to be more powerful but also more complex, making them slower and less energy-efficient.

What are the antonyms for Reduced instruction set computer?

Word of the Day

R OF O
The word "R OF O" does not exist in the English language or any other language. It is likely a typographical error and was intended to be another word. Without the correct word, it...