What is another word for rewriters?

Pronunciation: [ɹɪɹˈa͡ɪtəz] (IPA)

Rewriters are individuals who rewrite a piece of content, making changes to the language and structure while retaining the original meaning. Synonyms for the word "rewriters" include editors, revisers, and copy editors. These individuals are responsible for proofreading content for grammatical errors, spelling errors, and ensuring that the tone and language of the piece are consistent and accurate. Other synonyms for "rewriters" include copywriters, who write and then rewrite content for different mediums, such as email campaigns, social media ads, and blog posts. Ultimately, these individuals play an important role in ensuring that content is engaging, clear, and effective.

What are the hypernyms for Rewriters?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Famous quotes with Rewriters

  • One Western author who has become very popular among India’s history-writers is the American scholar Prof. Richard M. Eaton.... A selective reading of his work, focusing on his explanations but keeping most of his facts out of view, is made to serve the negationist position regarding temple destruction in the name of Islam. Yet, the numerically most important body of data presented by him concurs neatly with the classic (now dubbed “Hindutva”) account. In his oft-quoted paper “Temple desecration and Indo-Muslim states”, he gives a list of “eighty” cases of Islamic temple destruction. "Only eighty", is how the secularist history-rewriters render it, but Eaton makes no claim that his list is exhaustive. Moreover, eighty isn't always eighty. Thus, in his list, we find mentioned as one instance: "1994: Benares, Ghurid army. Did the Ghurid army work one instance of temple destruction? Eaton provides his source, and there we read that in Benares, the Ghurid royal army "destroyed nearly one thousand temples, and raised mosques on their foundations. (Note that unlike Sita Ram Goel, Richard Eaton is not chided by the likes of Sanjay Subramaniam for using Elliott and Dowson's "colonialist translation.") This way, practically every one of the instances cited by Eaton must be read as actually ten, or a hundred, or as in this case even a thousand temples destroyed. Even Eaton's non-exhaustive list, presented as part of "the kind of responsible and constructive discussion that this controversial topic so badly needs", yields the same thousands of temple destructions ascribed to the Islamic rulers in most relevant pre-1989 histories of Islam and in pro-Hindu publications.... If the “eighty” (meaning thousands of) cases of Islamic iconoclasm are only a trifle, the “abounding” instances of Hindu iconoclasm, “thoroughly integrated” in Hindu political culture, can reasonably be expected to number tens of thousands. Yet, Eaton’s list, given without reference to primary sources, contains, even in a maximalist reading (i.e., counting “two” when one king takes away two idols from one enemy’s royal temple), only 18 individual cases.... In this list, cases of actual destruction amount to exactly two...
    Koenraad Elst

Word of the Day

R OF O
The word "R OF O" does not exist in the English language or any other language. It is likely a typographical error and was intended to be another word. Without the correct word, it...