What is another word for wholes?

Pronunciation: [hˈə͡ʊlz] (IPA)

The word "wholes" primarily refers to the entire ensemble or a complete unit of things or entities. When you want to express this idea using synonyms, "totality," "entirety," "completeness," "holism," and "integrity" are some of the words you can use. The term "wholes" can also mean "fullness," "plenitude," "abundance," or "profusion." These words convey the idea of a large number or abundance of things, without being limited to a specific category. Additionally, "all," "aggregate," "sum total," "collective," and "ensemble" are some other synonyms that can be used to refer to "wholes".

What are the paraphrases for Wholes?

Paraphrases are restatements of text or speech using different words and phrasing to convey the same meaning.
Paraphrases are highlighted according to their relevancy:
- highest relevancy
- medium relevancy
- lowest relevancy

What are the hypernyms for Wholes?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

Usage examples for Wholes

We begin, therefore, with fragments, which are taken for wholes; and it is only by piecing together these fragments, and by the transformation of them involved in this combination, that we arrive at the real fact.
"John Dewey's logical theory"
Delton Thomas Howard
There comes a stage at which the recognition of the unity begins to dawn upon us, and yet, the tradition of the many distinct wholes survives; judgment has to combine these two contradictory conceptions; it does so by the theory that the dawning unity is an effect necessarily produced by the interaction of the former wholes.
"John Dewey's logical theory"
Delton Thomas Howard
In the other class, children seem to be dull in sense, unobserving, but dreamy, as if they had an over-mastering presentiment of that connection of things which binds them into wholes.
"Education in The Home, The Kindergarten, and The Primary School"
Elizabeth P. Peabody

Famous quotes with Wholes

  • Couples are wholes and not wholes, what agrees disagrees, the concordant is discordant. From all things one and from one all things.
    Heraclitus
  • The realization that systems are integrated wholes that cannot be understood by analysis was even more shocking in physics than in biology. Ever since Newton, physicists had believed that all physical phenomena could be reduced to the properties of hard and solid material particles. In the 1920s, however, quantum theory forced them to accept the fact that the solid material objects of classical physics dissolve at the subatomic level into wavelike patterns of probabilities. These patterns, moreover, do not represent probabilities of things, but rather probabilities of interconnections. The subatomic particles have no meaning as isolated entities but can be understood only as interconnections, or correlations, among various processes of observation and measurement. In other words, subatomic particles are not “things” but interconnections among things, and these, in turn, are interconnections among other things, and so on. In quantum theory we never end up with any “things”; we always deal with interconnections.
    Fritjof Capra
  • All of life and the cosmos can be seen as concinnous (harmoniously congruous, neat, elegant) wholes with a whole, unless in chaos; and, even then, chaos occurs (or is avoided) within systems (whether minute or vast) that are themselves balanced, or concinnous.
    Vanna Bonta
  • The course of modern history having already sapped the traditions and shattered the living wholes in which precious objects once found their place, the collector may now in good conscience go about excavating the choicer, more emblematic fragments.
    Susan Sontag
  • His appearance gives no clue to what his profession might be, and yet he doesn't look like a man without a profession either. Consider what he's like: He always knows what to do. He knows how to gaze into a woman's eyes. He can put his mind to any question at any time. He can box. He is gifted, strong-willed, open-minded, fearless, tenacious, dashing, circumspect — why quibble, suppose we grant him all those qualities — yet he has none of them! They have made him what he is, they have set his course for him, and yet they don't belong to him. When he is angry, something in him laughs. When he is sad, he is up to something. When something moves him, he turns against it. He'll always see a good side to every bad action. What he thinks of anything will always depend on some possible context — nothing is, to him, what it is: everything is subject to change, in flux, part of a whole, of an infinite number of wholes presumably adding up to a super-whole that, however, he knows nothing about. So every answer he gives is only a partial answer, every feeling an opinion, and he never cares what something is, only 'how' it is — some extraneous seasoning that somehow goes along with it, that's what interests him.
    Robert Musil

Word of the Day

fraternal benefit society benefits
The antonyms for "fraternal benefit society benefits" are difficult to pinpoint as they are more conceptual than actual opposites. However, some potential antonyms may include "ind...