What is another word for card-carrying?

Pronunciation: [kˈɑːdkˈaɹɪɪŋ] (IPA)

The term "card-carrying" typically refers to someone who holds a membership or affiliation with a particular organization or group. However, there are several synonyms that can be used to convey a similar meaning. For example, "bona fide" implies that someone is genuine and authentic in their affiliation. "Certified" suggests that someone has passed a formal test or evaluation to gain their membership. "Confirmed" implies that someone's status has been verified or made official. Finally, "enrolled" suggests that someone has signed up or registered with the organization or group in question. All of these terms provide alternative ways to describe someone's association with a particular group or society.

Synonyms for Card-carrying:

What are the hypernyms for Card-carrying?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for card-carrying?

Antonyms for the word "card-carrying" include nonmember, nonpartisan, unaffiliated, and unaligned. The term "card-carrying" is typically used to describe someone who is a member of a particular organization or group, and is often associated with politics or ideological movements. Antonyms for this term, therefore, describe those who are not members or who are not affiliated with any particular group or organization. Additionally, these antonyms suggest a lack of bias or allegiance to any one group, indicating a more neutral or independent stance.

Famous quotes with Card-carrying

  • As a kid, I was unquestionably a nerd, but it wasn't really a culture you could opt into or out of. It was just sort of something you were or were not. As far as today, I'm certainly friendly to that world, with my affinities, but I would probably get kicked out of the national convention for being a bit of a poser. I'm not as well-versed in many of the worlds that I'd need to be a bona fide card-carrying geek these days.
    Doug Dorst
  • For those unfamiliar with modern Indian history: the Marxists, already pushy for acquiring as much power in the institutions as they could grab, were handed a near-monopoly on institutional power in India's academic and educational sector by Indira Gandhi ca. 1970. Involved in an intra-Congress power struggle, she needed the help of the Left. Her confidants P.N. Haksar and Nurul Hasan packed the institutions with Marxists, card-carrying or otherwise. When, during the Emergency dictatorship (1975-77), her Communist Party allies threatened to become too powerful, she and her son Sanjay removed them from key political positions but, in a typical instance of politicians' short-sightedness, they left the Marxists? hold on the cultural sector intact. In the good old Soviet tradition, they at once set out to falsify history and propagate their own version through the official textbooks. After coming to power in 1998, the BJP-dominated government has made a half-hearted and not always very competent attempt to effect glasnost (openness, transparency) at least in the history textbooks. This led the Marxists to start a furious hate campaign against the so-called 'saffronization' of history.
    Koenraad Elst

Word of the Day

Professional Liabilities
The word "professional liabilities" refers to the legal or ethical obligations of a person working in a professional capacity. Antonyms for this term would incorporate words or phr...