I do not think that, practically or morally, we can defend a policy of saving every distinctive local population of organisms. I can cite a good rationale for the preservation of species, for each species is a unique and separate natural object that, once lost, can never be reconstituted. But subspecies are distinctive local populations of species with broader geographic range. subspecies are dynamic, interbreedable, and constantly changing: what then are we saving by declaring them all inviolate?
Stephen Jay Gould